Algunas interpretaciones de la Ilustración y su relación con Hegel : La radicalización de la autonomía racional como inmanentización de toda trascendencia

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor Principal: Sisto, Horacio Martín
Formato: Tesis
Temas:
Acceso en línea:https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/tesis/te.147/te.147.pdf
Resumen:Regarding the twentieth century's interpretations of the Enlightenment and its actuality, it is noteworthy that some authors, like Habermas in "The philosophical discourse of Modernity", rely on Hegel to defend the Enlightenment and its project, whereas other close thinkers, like Adorno and Horkheimer in their "Dialectic of Enlightenment", quote Hegel to emphasize the destructive aspects of Enlightenment. In this work I show that in the Hegelian theory of Enlightenment both aspects, the negative and the programmatic, are present. I hold here that the Hegelian philosophy claims to be the consummation and not the rupture with this movement. This is expressed in the subtitle of the thesis: in the philosophy of Hegel the principle of autonomy is made absolute in terms of an immanentization of any transcendence that could have been still recognized or latent in the thought of the Enlightenment. For a theory of the Enlightenment I consider as reference the exposition of Cassirer, "The Philosophy of the Enlightenment ". As reference texts of the Hegelian philosophy I follow principally passages from "The Phenomenology of Spirit" and "Glauben und Wissen".
Notas:Original mecanografiado
Descripción Física:243 p.

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a2200000 a 4500
001 TESIS00122
008 190506s1999####|||#####|m########0#####d
080 |a 1(Hegel) 
100 |a Sisto, Horacio Martín 
700 |a Brauer, Oscar Daniel  |e dir. 
245 1 0 |a Algunas interpretaciones de la Ilustración y su relación con Hegel  |b : La radicalización de la autonomía racional como inmanentización de toda trascendencia 
041 7 |2 ISO 639-1  |a es 
300 |a 243 p. 
502 |g Tesis de grado  |b Licenciado en Filosofía  |c Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación  |d 1999 
500 |a Original mecanografiado 
520 3 |a Regarding the twentieth century's interpretations of the Enlightenment and its actuality, it is noteworthy that some authors, like Habermas in "The philosophical discourse of Modernity", rely on Hegel to defend the Enlightenment and its project, whereas other close thinkers, like Adorno and Horkheimer in their "Dialectic of Enlightenment", quote Hegel to emphasize the destructive aspects of Enlightenment. In this work I show that in the Hegelian theory of Enlightenment both aspects, the negative and the programmatic, are present. I hold here that the Hegelian philosophy claims to be the consummation and not the rupture with this movement. This is expressed in the subtitle of the thesis: in the philosophy of Hegel the principle of autonomy is made absolute in terms of an immanentization of any transcendence that could have been still recognized or latent in the thought of the Enlightenment. For a theory of the Enlightenment I consider as reference the exposition of Cassirer, "The Philosophy of the Enlightenment ". As reference texts of the Hegelian philosophy I follow principally passages from "The Phenomenology of Spirit" and "Glauben und Wissen". 
600 1 0 |a Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 
650 0 4 |a Ilustración 
650 0 4 |a Escuelas filosóficas 
650 0 4 |a Fenomenología 
856 4 0 |u https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/tesis/te.147/te.147.pdf 
542 1 |f Esta obra está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Argentina  |u https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ 
942 |c TES 
952 |i 65283  |p 65283  |a DEPOSITO CERRADO  |b DEPOSITO CERRADO  |z Solicitar en Mostrador  |o Tesis 113  |7 1  |k 11 
952 |a MEMORIA ACADEMICA  |b MEMORIA ACADEMICA  |u https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/tesis/te.147/te.147.pdf