Disagreeing over evaluatives : preference, normative and moral discourses

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en: Manuscrito. Vol. 38 No. 2 (2015),39-63 38. Campinas : Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência, 2015
Autor Principal: Díaz Legaspe, Justina
Formato: Artículo
Temas:
Acceso en línea:https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.13416/pr.13416.pdf
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/102508
Resumen:Why would we argue about taste, norms or morality when we know that these topics are relative to taste preferences, systems of norms or values to which we are committed? Yet, disagreements over these topics are common in our evaluative discourses. I will claim that the motives to discuss rely on our attitudes towards the standard held by the speakers in each domain of discourse, relating different attitudes to different motives -mainly, conviction and correction. These notions of attitudes and motives will allow me to claim that different domains of evaluative discourse have a different distribution of disagreements driven by them.
Descripción Física:p.39-63
ISSN:ISSN 2317-630X

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000 a 4500
001 ARTI13406
008 230422s2015####|||#####|#########0#####d
100 |a Díaz Legaspe, Justina  |u Universidad Nacional de La Plata 
245 1 0 |a Disagreeing over evaluatives  |b : preference, normative and moral discourses 
041 7 |2 ISO 639-1  |a en 
300 |a  p.39-63 
520 3 |a Why would we argue about taste, norms or morality when we know that these topics are relative to taste preferences, systems of norms or values to which we are committed? Yet, disagreements over these topics are common in our evaluative discourses. I will claim that the motives to discuss rely on our attitudes towards the standard held by the speakers in each domain of discourse, relating different attitudes to different motives -mainly, conviction and correction. These notions of attitudes and motives will allow me to claim that different domains of evaluative discourse have a different distribution of disagreements driven by them. 
653 |a Disagreements 
653 |a Evaluative expressios 
653 |a Lewis 
653 |a Conversational dynamics 
856 4 0 |u https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.13416/pr.13416.pdf 
952 |u https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.13416/pr.13416.pdf  |a MEMORIA ACADEMICA  |b MEMORIA ACADEMICA 
856 4 1 |u http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/102508 
773 0 |7 nnas  |t Manuscrito.   |g Vol. 38 No. 2 (2015),39-63  |v 38  |l 2  |q 39-63  |d Campinas : Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência, 2015  |x ISSN 2317-630X 
542 1 |f Esta obra está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional  |u http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/