Unemployment persistence in Argentina. Micro and macroeconomic analysis of its regional incidence

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en: World Economic Forum. No. 2 (2004). : Fudan-University, 2004
Autor Principal: Féliz, Mariano
Otros autores o Colaboradores: Pérez, Pablo Ernesto, Panigo, Demian
Formato: Artículo
Temas:
Acceso en línea:https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.9287/pr.9287.pdf
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/89423
Resumen:The aim of this paper is to develop a simple methodology for the study of regional unemployment persistence in Argentina. We use two complementary perspectives, combining a macroeconomic (aggregate) hysteresis approach with a microeconomic dynamic (individual-two-stage) evaluation. Macroeconomic results indicate that most of the shocks affecting the unemployment rate in different regions and population sub-groups are predominantly persistent (because both participation and mainly em- ployment hysteresis). On the other hand, the microeconomic analysis allow us to detect a strong state-dependence effect (for most regions and mainly for young people and women), while duration-dependece is only significative for high unemployment periods

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000 a 4500
001 ARTI09237
008 230422s2004####|||#####|#########0#####d
100 |a Féliz, Mariano  |u CEIL-PIETTE (CONICET) / UNLP 
700 |a Pérez, Pablo Ernesto  |u CEIL-PIETTE (CONICET) / UNLP 
700 |a Panigo, Demian  |u CEIL-PIETTE (CONICET) / UNLP 
245 1 0 |a Unemployment persistence in Argentina. Micro and macroeconomic analysis of its regional incidence 
041 7 |2 ISO 639-1  |a en 
520 3 |a The aim of this paper is to develop a simple methodology for the study of regional unemployment persistence in Argentina. We use two complementary perspectives, combining a macroeconomic (aggregate) hysteresis approach with a microeconomic dynamic (individual-two-stage) evaluation. Macroeconomic results indicate that most of the shocks affecting the unemployment rate in different regions and population sub-groups are predominantly persistent (because both participation and mainly em- ployment hysteresis). On the other hand, the microeconomic analysis allow us to detect a strong state-dependence effect (for most regions and mainly for young people and women), while duration-dependece is only significative for high unemployment periods 
653 |a Unemployment persistence 
653 |a Regional unempolyment 
653 |a Duration-dependece 
653 |a State-dependence 
650 0 4 |a Microeconomía 
650 0 4 |a Desempleo 
650 0 4 |a Argentina 
856 4 0 |u https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.9287/pr.9287.pdf 
952 |u https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.9287/pr.9287.pdf  |a MEMORIA ACADEMICA  |b MEMORIA ACADEMICA 
856 4 1 |u http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/89423 
773 0 |7 nnas  |t World Economic Forum.   |g  No. 2 (2004)  |l 2  |d  : Fudan-University, 2004 
542 1 |f Esta obra está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional  |u https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/